Download C. S. Lewis’s Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument by Victor Reppert PDF

By Victor Reppert

During this e-book Victor Reppert champions C. S. Lewis. Darwinists try and use technological know-how to teach that our global and its population should be absolutely defined because the made from a senseless, purposeless process of physics and chemistry. yet Lewis claimed in his argument from cause that if such materialism or naturalism have been actual then medical reasoning itself couldn't be relied on. Victor Reppert believes that Lewis's arguments were too frequently brushed aside. In C. S. Lewis's harmful thought Reppert deals cautious, capable improvement of Lewis's idea and demonstrates that the elemental thrust of Lewis's argument from cause can undergo up lower than the burden of the main severe philosophical assaults.

Show description

Read Online or Download C. S. Lewis’s Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason PDF

Similar history & philosophy books

How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy Slopes of Logic

This in-depth learn of the improvement of philosophy of technology reports within the usa in the course of the chilly struggle files the political energy of logical empiricism and Otto Neurath's cohesion of technological know-how circulation whilst the circulation emigrated to the U. S. within the Thirties. It follows its de-politicization by means of a convergence of highbrow, cultural and political forces within the Fifties.

Demonstrating Science with Soap Films

Many folks were involved as young ones via cleaning soap bubbles and cleaning soap motion pictures. Their shapes and hues are attractive and they're nice enjoyable to pay with. with out les depth, scientists and mathematicians were attracted to the homes of bubbles and movies all through clinical historical past. during this ebook David Lovett describes the houses of cleaning soap movies and cleaning soap bubbles.

Evolution, Games, and God: The Principle of Cooperation

In response to the reigning competition-driven version of evolution, egocentric behaviors that maximize an organism’s reproductive capability provide a health virtue over self-sacrificing behaviors—rendering unselfish habit for the sake of others a secret that calls for additional rationalization. Evolution, video games, and God addresses this conundrum by way of exploring how cooperation, operating along mutation and traditional choice, performs a severe position in populations from microbes to human societies.

Breaking into the Lab Engineering Progress for Women in Science

Why are there so few ladies in technological know-how? In Breaking into the Lab, Sue Rosser makes use of the stories of winning girls scientists and engineers to reply to the query of why elite associations have so few girls scientists and engineers tenured on their colleges. girls are hugely certified, stimulated scholars, and but they've got greatly larger charges of attrition, and they're shying clear of the fields with the best call for for employees and the largest fiscal payoffs, similar to engineering, computing device sciences, and the actual sciences.

Additional info for C. S. Lewis’s Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason

Sample text

This doctrine consists in maintaining that, if l\\O men differ abollt "allles, thcre is not a dis· ilgrccmcllt as 10 all)' kind of tmth, hut a difference of tastc. : 1 While subsequent ethic,,1 subjectivists m,,), not have found this comparison with taste in food a good an"log), to describe their position, m"jor figures like Russell and A. j. A)'er did describe their own view in just the wa)' that Beversluis refers to "s a straw man. In addition, some of the comments Beversluis attributes to Lewis appe"r to be eOlllmenls not "bout what all unbelievers sa)' and do, but anI), about what SOllle sa)' "nd do.

1 rootnolc. "John Be\'ersillii, C. S. ~ cllld lIu: Srclrc:il Ii" /(cJtimltll ncligiml (Cr;md Rapids, l\lich Ecrdm,ms, 1(85), pp. 83. C. S. I,,'wis, E/bJbelil t\m(:omIJl.! clnJ lhe t\rgulllf:rl1 (rom l{eclSoll 47 supern~tural c~us~tion. The most popular kind of natur~lism is known ~s materi~lism or physic~lism. M~teri~lism m~int~ins tlwt the b~sic subst~nces of the physic~1 world ~re pieces of m~ller, ~nd physic~lism m~intains th~t those pieces of m~ller are properly understood by the discipline of physics.

So let us formulate the argument once again: 1. No belief is rationally inferred if it can be fully explained in terms of nonmtionul cuuses. 2. If materialism is true, then all beliefs can be fully explained in terms of nonmtionul cuuses. >:'Scc cspccially Bc"crsluis, C. S. Lewis clud the Secln:", pp. 80-81. 111 our knowlcdge depcnds on the \'tlJidit)· of rc'lsoning. m cxtcmal world. 11 he says secms Jlcrfcctly compatible with the idea thai we perceive physical objccts dircctly, without pcrforming inferences in so doing.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.11 of 5 – based on 15 votes